|
Engineers at NASA are concerned about the Ares 1 first stage. Simulations have
shown that with its current design the engine would produce a frequency of about
25 Hz at liftoff. Due to Ares 1 structural design the concern is that this kinetic
oscillation could shake the systems upper stage and the Orion capsule that carries
the human passengers.
At worst this has the possibly to create considerable damage that could affect control
avionics in the rocket's Instrumentation Unit. This launch system also requires two
new radical engine development programs. A new five segment Solid Rocket
Booster (SRB) for the 1st stage with its $3 billion development cost and J-2X Liquid
propellant engine for the 2nd stage at an estimated $1.2 billion development cost.
It's also more than likely that further funding is needed plus a longer development
schedule due to the higher safety risk of new - unproven flight hardware. Recently
an alternative launch system to Are's I and V has been proposed by a group of
NASA engineers who say that it would be much safer and cheaper to focus on
reconfiguring the current space shuttle's matured 'proven' rocket technology.
Their design proposal requires no major radical new designs as the Ares - Orion
program calls for. This program known as DIRECT 2.0 calls upon the use of existing
'spaceware' without the need to radically modify them or develop new and
untested designs (like Ares.) The DIRECT 2.0 Jupiter Launch Vehicle family can be
directly configured from the shuttle's 1st stage solid rocket boosters and liquid fuel
tank plus the launch engines from the RS-68 (Rocket System 68) developed for the
Delta IV.
If the DIRECT 2.0 Jupiter launch proposal could be utilized then it would allow
NASA to shift it's funding to it's other science projects and extend it's ability to
achieve more exploration science/per/dollar than the current projected Ares I and
V manned lunar program.
Jupiter Direct’s backers estimate development costs for both of their models at $13
billion, compared to an estimated combined cost of $25 billion for the Ares I and V,
a saving of $12 billion tax payers dollars. Given the circumstance's of the global
economic crises this should be coincided thinking about!
For further reading see:
Popular Mechanics - Frustrated Engineers Battle with NASA
Wikipedia - "Jupiter" launch system
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.